Vikas Verma @ Vikas Kumar Verma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80515 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-332 Year-2018 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== VIKAS VERMA @ VIKAS KUMAR VERMA Son of Arjun Verma @ Saryug Verma Resident of Village - Sansar Pokhar Gandhi Tola Ward No. 17, P.S.- Kabaiya, Lakhisarai, District- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)a/27 of the Arms Act. Earlier, the bail application of the petitioner was rejected on 29.03.2019 vide Annexure-1.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 21.06.2018.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage. Hence, the prayer for bail of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80515 of 2019(2) dt.18-12-2019 2/2 petitioner is hereby rejected.

However, after framing of charges, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Lakhisarai (Kabaiya) P.S. Case No. 332 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T