Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85008 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-196 Year-2025 Thana- BUXAR RAIL P.S. District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Son of Pradeep Rai R/o Village - Ward no. 25 Dakshin Tola Dumraon, P.S. - Dumraon, Dist. - Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dr.Kamal Deo Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Buxar Rail P.S. Case No. 196 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 137(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that while the informant was traveling on train number 12392 with his wife and son from Delhi to Patna, it is alleged that near Dumrao Railway Station, the petitioner attempted to alight with the minor son of the informant; meanwhile, he woke up, called the R.P.F., and there the petitioner was apprehended with the son.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85008 of 2025(2) dt.16-12-2025 2/2 counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a copassenger and there has been a dispute between the parties regarding the seat. The petitioner has requested the informant to permit him to sit on his seat. It has further been submitted that this petitioner has been framed in this case. Actually, no offense has been committed. The petitioner was apprehended in the train itself. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 25.08.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Buxar Rail P.S. Case No. 196 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T