Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2497/2024bail granted

Krishna Yadav @ Krishna Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-31Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2497 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2023 Thana- TEYAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

KRISHNA YADAV @ KRISHNA SINGH Son Of Sri Bhagwan Yadav Resident Of Village -Andharibagh P.S.-Tiyar,District- Bhojpur 2.

PARAS YADAV@ PARASNATH SINGH Son Of Dinanath Yadav Resident Of Village -Andharibagh P.S.-Tiyar,District- Bhojpur 3.

BIRAN YADAV Son Of Dinanath Yadav Resident Of Village -Andharibagh P.S.-Tiyar,District- Bhojpur 4.

PARSHURAM YADAV Son Of Dinanath Yadav Resident Of Village -Andharibagh P.S.-Tiyar,District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Shiv Prasad Gupta, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 31-01-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, ten named accused persons, including these petitioners, and 20-25 unknown persons were found indulged in assaulting and firing.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that there is no specific accusation against these petitioners. These petitioners are only alleged to be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2497 of 2024(2) dt.31-01-2024 2/2 members of the mob. There is no injury report on record to support the prosecution case. The two motorcycles that are alleged to have been seized from the place of occurrence does not belong to these petitioners. Petitioner Nos. 1, 2 and 4 have got no criminal antecedents and Petitioner No. 3 has one criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara, in connection with Tiyar P.S. Case No.67 of 2023, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T