Nagmani Kumar @ Nagmani Sah @ Nagmani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82494 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-149 Year-2019 Thana- MANIYARI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== NAGMANI KUMAR @ NAGMANI SAH @ NAGMANI Son of Laxman Sah Resident of Village - Jagdishpur, Ratnauli, P.S.- Maniyari, DistrictMuzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mazharul Hassan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Maniyari P.S. Case No. 149 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a/26/35 of the Arms Act.

Allegation is recovery of one live cartridge from the possession of petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and nothing was recovered from his possession. Petitioner is in custody since 12.06.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82494 of 2019(2) dt.12-12-2019 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below, in connection with Maniyari P.S. Case No. 149 of 2019 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T