Md. Sohrab Ansari @ Md. Sohrab Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7150 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-278 Year-2017 Thana- KHAGARIA District- Khagaria ====================================================== Md. Sohrab Ansari @ Md. Sohrab Alam, Son of Md. Abid Ali, Resident of Village- Hakam Pran Tola, Police Station- Mohammadpur, DistrictGopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sadanand Paswan (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Khagaria P.S. Case No. 278 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 469, 471, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per complaint petition, petitioner along with co-accused cheated the complainant/informant and others and took Rs. 6,50,000/- on pretext to provide job in Railway department.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7150 of 2019(3) dt.18-02-2019 2/3 falsely implicated in this case on the basis of suspicion. Petitioner has no concern with the transaction of money. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 31.10.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, in connection with Khagaria P.S. Case No. 278 of 2017, subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7150 of 2019(3) dt.18-02-2019 3/3 case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U