Mukesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78984 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-397 Year-2019 Thana- SIWAN MUFFASIL District- Siwan ====================================================== Mukesh Yadav, male, aged about 30 years, Son of Ashok Chaudhary Resident of Village - Lakhraon, P.S.- Siwan Muffasil, District- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 397 of 2019 registered for offences under sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

As per allegation, altogether 25 liter 380 ml illegal liquor, kept in a plastic bag, has been recovered from the bush beside the house of the petitioner.

The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Looking to the quantity of liquor recovered as also the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78984 of 2019(2) dt.11-12-2019 2/2 court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge 2nd - cum - Special Judge Excise, Siwan in connection with Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 397 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T