Patna High CourtCR. MISC./78961/2019bail granted

Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-04Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78961 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2019 Thana- KUTUMBA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

Vikash Kumar Son of Brij Mohan Mehta Resident of Village - Pipari Ibrahimpur, P.S.- Kutumba, Distt.- Aurangabad (Bihar) 2.

Saryu Yadav @ Sarjoo Yadav Son of Bharath Yadav Resident of Village - Sultanpur, P.S.- Kutumba, Distt.- Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Lal Bahadur Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Rita Verma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

In this case, the petitioners are seeking bail in Kutumba P.S. Case No.141 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under Section 30 (a) of Bihar Excise (Prohibition) Amendment Act.

As per allegation, 79.2 liters of country made liquor were recovered from a Tempo. The petitioners were arrested while fleeing away from the Tempo. However, it is submitted that petitioners are in custody since 30.09.2019. It is claimed that their antecedents are clean.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78961 of 2019(2) dt.04-12-2019 2/2 the petitioners, above-named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-VII-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Aurangabad in connection with Kutumba P.S. Case No. 141/2019 with a condition that if the petitioners, after their release in this case, are again found involved in similar nature of cases then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. (Shivaji Pandey, J) V.K.Pandey/- U T