Ramesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88165 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-893 Year-2024 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1.

Ramesh Kumar Son of Chhedi Lal Resident of Village - Muralikapura, P.S. - Baghrai, District - Pratapgrh, UP 2.

Kundan Kumar Das Son of Maheshwar Das Resident of Village - Bachhauli, P.S. - Khanpur, District - Samastipur, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Aquaib Khan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 893 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 32(i), 32(iii), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, 648 liters liquor was recovered from pick-up vehicle and the petitioners were apprehended on spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material have been recovered

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88165 of 2024(2) dt.08-01-2025 2/2 from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that petitioner no. 1 is driver and petitioner no. 2 is passenger of the said vehicle in question and they have got no knowledge regarding the goods being loaded in the vehicle. The petitioners are in custody since 23.11.2024 and have got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 893 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T