Anil Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85019 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2025 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Anil singh S/O Late Deonarayan Singh R/O Village- Hariharpur (Bhagwati Sthan), P.S- Teghra, Distt.- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar, Adv.

Mrs. Pampy Kumari, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nitya Nand Tiwary, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 10-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 94 of 2025, registered for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 109, 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner and other coaccused persons assaulted the wife of the informant and snatched her mangalsutra and Rs.1000/- cash.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case with fabricated allegations. For an occurrence of 19.08.2024, the FIR has been lodged on 01.04.2025 and this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85019 of 2025(2) dt.10-12-2025 2/3 huge delay shows the FIR has been lodged after much deliberation and only in order to falsely implicate the petitioner and others. There is no satisfactory explanation for this delay. The instant FIR has been lodged with intention to encroach upon the land of the petitioner and others. The petitioner and informant are co-sharers of one ancestor and petitioner is a 75 years old person and has been suffering incarceration without any wrongful act on his part. The petitioner is in custody since 27.09.2025 and he has no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner.

6. Having regard to the fact and circumstances and submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the delay in lodging of the FIR and improbable nature of accusation and also considering the clean antecedent of the petitioner along with his period of custody and submission of charge sheet, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Begusarai/concerned court, in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 94 of 2025, subject to the condition laid

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85019 of 2025(2) dt.10-12-2025 3/3 down under Section 480(3) of the BNSS and other following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial court.

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) anuradha/- U T