Nurshaba Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88864 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-176 Year-2024 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Nurshaba Khatoon, W/o- Hasib Khan @ Hasib Ahmad Khan, VillageMauhana, P.S.-Sasaram Mufassil, District- Rohtas 2.

Hujaifa Khan @ Hujaifa Hasib Khan, S/o- Hasib Khan @ Hasib Ahmad Khan, Village- Mauhana, P.S.-Sasaram Mufassil, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Aquaib Khan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sasaram (Mufassil) P.S. Case No. 176 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 34 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegation against the petitioners is that they along with the other co-accused persons abused and assaulted the informant and his brother due to which they sustained injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case with intention to grab the residential house of the petitioners. Initially the case was registered under the bailable Sections but later on added Section 307 of the IPC on the basis

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88864 of 2024(2) dt.08-01-2025 2/2 of forged and fabricated report of injury. Petitioner no. 1 is a female and petitioner no. 2 is a student of Electrical Engineering. Both the parties are next door neighbour. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent and they undertake to cooperate in the investigation and trial of this case.

5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court where the case is pending in connection with Sasaram (Mufassil) P.S. Case No. 176 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) khushbu/- U T