Sanjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.133 of 2019 ====================================================== Sanjeet Kumar son of Raj Kishore Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Kudhani, P.O.+ P.S.- Kudhani, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The District Magistrate-cum- Collector, District- Muzaffarpur. 3.

The Deputy Collector Land Reform, West Muzaffarpur, DistrictMuzaffarpur. 4.

The Sub Divisional Officer, West Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur. 5.

The Circle Officer, Kudhani, District- Muzaffarpur. 6.

Officer-in- Charge, Kudhani Police Station, District- Muzaffarpur. 7.

Naveen Kumar @ Pappu, son of Late Vibhuti Prasad, Resident of Village P.O. P.S.- Kudhani, District- Muzaffarpur.

8.

Rajeev Kumar son of Indradeo Prasad @ Tuntun Prasad, Resident of Village P.O. P.S.- Kudhani, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Ranjan For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ajay- Ga5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 07-01-2020 The petition filed on 02.01.2019 is listed for hearing for the first time today before the Court.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief/s: "For directing and commanding the respondent to remove the encroachment from Old Tauzi no. 6024, Khesara no. 1115, New Khata no. 1129, 1147, New Khesara no. 3031, 3032, area 5 decimal recorded as Parti Kadim, used as Aam Rasta since very long, encroached by private respondents no. 7 & 8."

Patna High Court CWJC No.133 of 2019(2) dt.07-01-2020 2/2 After the matter was heard for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to the concerned respondents to consider and decide the representation, which the petitioner shall be making afresh within a period of four weeks from today. Learned counsel for the State states that upon receipt of such request, if any, the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law, expeditiously and positively within a period of three months from the date of receipt thereof. Equally, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law.

We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available in law, before the appropriate forum, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law and with reasonable dispatch. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) K.C.Jha/- U