Prince Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87529 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2025 Thana- NADI P.S. District- Patna ====================================================== Prince Kumar S/O Pintoo Saw @ Pintu Kumar R/O Village- Govind Pur, P.SFatuha, Distt.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bindeshwar Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-01-2026 Heard Mr. Bindeshwar Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 02.09.2025 in connection with Nadi P.S. Case No. 200 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 25.07.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 87, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.
3. According to prosecution case, the informant alleged that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons kidnapped his minor daughter for the purpose of marriage.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87529 of 2025(3) dt.15-01-2026 2/3 committed offence as alleged in the FIR and the victim has been recovered and she has not supported the case of the prosecution in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C/183 BNSS. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet and cognizance has been taken against the petitioner on 30.09.2025, charge-sheet no.466 of 2025 under Section 137(2), 96, 3(5) of BNSS and the petitioner is in custody since 02.09.2025.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, petitioner has clean antecedent and the victim has not supported the case of the prosecution in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C/183 BNSS, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned JMFC, Patna City, Patna in connection with Nadi P.S. Case No. 200 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87529 of 2025(3) dt.15-01-2026 3/3 on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Suruchi/- U T