Jitendra Kumar Singh @ Jitendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90018 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2022 Thana- NATWAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Jitendra Kumar Singh @ Jitendra Kumar Son of Shri Bhagwan Singh Resident of Village - Kishunpura, P.S. - (Natwar) Dinara, District - Rohtas, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Nagendra Upadhyay, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Mohammed Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-01-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 465, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that this petitioner is using a sim card which was issued on the basis of forged documents. It is further alleged that this petitioner is having two voter I.D. cards.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case merely on suspicion. The sim card in question has been issued on the basis of valid documents and petitioner is owner of Mobile No. 9546432649 which was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90018 of 2024(2) dt.30-01-2025 2/2 issued on the basis of Voter I.D. No. GGQ6099501. Petitioner did not obtain sim card on the basis of forged document as alleged in the F.I.R.. As a matter of fact the address and date of birth in the voter I.D. card and aadhar card of the petitioner are same. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, nature of accusation and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Natwar P.S. Case No. 67 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T