Chandan Hari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86600 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2025 Thana- SAJOUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.
Chandan Hari Son of Late Sukhdev Hari Resident of Village - Bari Khanjarpur Medical Colony, Police Station - Barari, District - Bhagalpur. 2.
Dabalu Hari Son of Late Sukhdev Hari Resident of Village - Bari Khanjarpur Medical Colony, Police Station - Barari, District - Bhagalpur. 3.
Shekhar Hari Son of Late Sukhdev Hari Resident of Village - Bari Khanjarpur Medical Colony, Police Station - Barari, District - Bhagalpur. 4.
Prince Hari @ Prince Kumar Son of Shekhar Hari Resident of Village - Bari Khanjarpur Medical Colony, Police Station - Barari, District - Bhagalpur. 5.
Dipak Hari @ Dipak Kumar Son of Shekhar Hari Resident of Village - Bari Khanjarpur Medical Colony, Police Station - Barari, District - Bhagalpur. ... ... petitioners/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the petitioners/s :
Mr. Shraddhanand Paswan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-01-2026 Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sajour P.S. Case No. 132 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 13.08.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 108 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. According to prosecution case, the son of the informant was in love with the daughter of the petitioner no. 3 and they wanted to marry each other, so these petitioners threatened the son of the informant due to which he committed
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86600 of 2025(2) dt.08-01-2026 2/3 suicide.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have clean antecedent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the F.I.R is false and fabricated and the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. In fact, the deceased was in love with the daughter of Shekhar Hari (petitioner no. 3) and due to this reason the petitioners have persuaded the son of the informant to commit suicide. It appears from the record of the case that the date of occurrence is 04.08.2025 and the postmortem was conducted on 05.08.2025 but the F.I.R was instituted on 13.08.2025 only after thought to falsely implicate these petitioners.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86600 of 2025(2) dt.08-01-2026 3/3 Sajour P.S. Case No. 132 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and with other following conditions:- i. Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioners tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U T