← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85297/2025allowed

Ramroop @ Rohan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-07Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85297 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2025 Thana- DEEPNAGAR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Ramroop @ Rohan Kumar S/o Satyendra Kumar R/o Village- Daroga Bigha, P.S.- Deepnagar, District- Nalanda, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Advocate.

Mr. Chetan Anand, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-01-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Deepnagar P.S. Case No.93 of 2025 instituted under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 324(4), 61(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, as soon as informant came to know that some antisocial elements are trying to capture his land situated in Mauza Kalyanpur, he reached there and saw that petitioner alongwith other unknown persons were destroying the boundary wall of his land and when the informant stopped to do so, the petitioner and others started assaulting him. It is further alleged that the petitioner taken rifle

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85297 of 2025(2) dt.07-01-2026 2/3 from his vehicle and opened fire on the informant and threaten to left the place.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to village politics. He further submits that the petitioner has no concern with the land in question and petitioner was neither present on the spot nor any incriminating material has been recovered from his conscious possession. Learned counsel submits that allegation of firing is super addition and ornamental. No injury has been caused to the person of informant. He further submits that petitioner has got clean antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial of the case.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-I, Bihar Sharif (Nalanda) in connection with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85297 of 2025(2) dt.07-01-2026 3/3 Deepnagar P.S. Case No.93 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T