Kanhaiya Lal Raut v. The State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7093 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-344 Year-1998 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== Kanhaiya Lal Raut Son of Sri Parmeshwari Raut Resident of Mohalla- Near Kenal, Purnea, P.S. and District- Purnea.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Shri Dinesh Chandra Verma, the Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, Branch- Supaul P.S. and District- Supaul, Permanent Address- at Madhubani, Amla Tola, P.S.- Khajanchi Haat, P.S. and District- Purnea. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Amrit Abhijat, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs.Rina Sinha, APP For the Bank :
Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-04-2019 The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Supaul P.S.Case No. 344 of 1998 registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471/34 of the Indian penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is that he in collusion with other accused persons, withdrew Rs. 20000/- from the account of the informant and petitioner happens to be the waterman.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner has been made escape-goat and as a matter of fact coaccused Madan Kumar Vishwash who has withdrawn the amount and now he has deposited the amount also. Heard learned APP as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Central Bank of India, who has opposed the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7093 of 2019(4) dt.04-04-2019 2/2 prayer for anticipatory bail on the ground that process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. has already been issued against the petitioner. Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to him rather he should surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and make prayer for regular bail, which shall be considered and disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sujit/- U T