Md. Kashim Mansuri @ Md. Kashim v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88988 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2025 Thana- LAUKAHA District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Md. Kashim Mansuri @ Md. Kashim S/o Jumrati Mansoori R/o VillageLalmania, P.S.- Laukaha, District- Madhubani 2.

Jamirun Khatoon W/o Md. Ijrafil R/o Vill- Bhelha, P.S.- Lalmaniya, DisttMadhubani 3.

Md. Hafeez S/o Late Md. Aseer R/o Vill- Laukaha, P.S.- Laukaha, DisttMadhubani 4.

Md. Habib S/o Late Md. Aseer R/o Vill- Bishanpur, P.S.- Lalmaniya, DisttMadhubani 5.

Hasina Khatun Wife of Md. Habib R/o Village- Vishnpur, P.s.- Lalmania, District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Bharti For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Murli Dhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-02-2026 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with respect to petitioner no. 1 (Md. Kashim Mansuri @ Md. Kashim), who was arrested during pendency of the same. 3.

Permission is accorded.

4.

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with respect to petitioner no. 1 (Md.

2/4 Kashim Mansuri @ Md. Kashim).

5.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 121(1), 132, 74, 352 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

6.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a supplementary affidavit has been filed wherein the correct address of petitioner nos. 2 and 4 has been pleaded, it is next submitted that Village and PS of petitioner No. 5 was already rectified, thus seeks permission to correct the address of petitioner nos. 2 and 4.

7.

Permission is accorded.

8.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner nos. 2 and 5 are women and the informant alleges that that post mortem of Aasma Khatoon was conducted on 14.07.2025 and thereafter her dead body was handed over to her family members and burial was to take place on 15.07.2025 after arrival of her husband, Md. Hafiz, from Dubai, it is next alleged that her husband came on 15.07.2025 and kept the dead body at the house of the accused persons, who were alleged to have committed the killing of the deceased and started pelting stones

3/4 and thereafter started preparation to bury the dead body in the house of the accused persons, accordingly on receiving information, the informant with police force reached the place of occurrence, when accused persons started abusing the force and also pelted stones, thereafter Chaukidar disclosed the name of the accused persons who were involved in the occurrence, further in the occurrence, two female constable were injured who were treated at P.H.C. Khutauna.

9.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that allegation of pelting stones is general and omnibus in nature. It is also submitted that Kuraisa Khatoon had approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc No. 82553 of 2025 and the same came to be allowed by an order dated 9-122025. 10.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

11.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and taking into consideration the order dated 9-12-2025 in Cr. Misc No. 82553 of 2025, the

4/4 petitioner nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Laukaha P.S. Case No. 103 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T