← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./89134/2024bail granted

Ranjan Kumar @ Rajan Kumar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-09Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89134 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-297 Year-2024 Thana- NAVINAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Ranjan Kumar @ Rajan Kumar Paswan S/o Ganesh Paswan R/o VillageMadar, P.S- Hussainabad, (Japla), District- Palamu, Jharkhand ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 297 of 2024, G.R. No. 620 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 317(5), 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, 60 liters liquor was recovered from motorcycle and the petitioner was apprehended on spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89134 of 2024(2) dt.09-01-2025 2/2 the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is not the owner of the said motorcycle in question. The petitioner is in custody since 11.11.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 297 of 2024, G.R. No. 620 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T