Malti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.476 of 2024 ====================================================== Malti Kumari wife of Mukesh Kumar, resident of Village-Maheshpur, P.S.- Chanan, District-Lakhisarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Director, Integrated Child Development Service, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Collector, Lakhisarai.

4.

District Programme Officer Integrated Child Development Service, Lakhisarai.

5.

Child Development Project Officer, Chanan.

6.

Lady Supervisor, Child Development Officer, Chanan 7.

District Sub Registrar, Lakhisarai.

8.

Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Maliya, P.S.-Chanan, District-Lakhisarai. 9.

Smt. Seema Kumari, Wife of Sudhir Kumar, resident of Village-Moura, P.S.- Gidhour, District-Jamui.

10.

Ratneshwar Puja Sammittee, Ratneshwar Dham Temple, Gram Panchayat Bariyarpur, P.S.-Malehpur, District-Jamui.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anupa Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Standing Counsel 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 29-02-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1.(i) For issuance of an appropriate/writs quashing the order dated 12.07.2023 passed by the respondent Collector, Lakhisarai in Anganbari Appeal Case No. 7 2022 by which the respondent Collector

Patna High Court CWJC No.476 of 2024(2) dt.29-02-2024 2/2 aforesaid rejected the appeal preferred by the petitioner.

(ii) For issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondent No.5 Child Development Project Officer, Chanan (Lakhisarai) to appoint the petitioner on the post of Sevika in Anganbari Centre for Ward No.13 of the Maliya Panchayat."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the Ld. Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U