Abhishek Kumar @ Vishal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85136 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-436 Year-2025 Thana- HISUWA District- Nawada ====================================================== Abhishek Kumar @ Vishal Kumar S/O Nityanand Singh R/O VillageNavgardhal, P.S- Makdmpur, District- Jahanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Madhuri Lata, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-03-2026 Heard Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Madhuri Lata, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 04.08.2025 in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 436 of 2025, FIR dated 26.07.2025 registered for the offence under Section 310(4), 310(5), 312, 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of Arms Act.

3. Accordingly to the prosecution case, it is alleged that on 25.07.2025 at about 9 P.M when the informant was at his home office then the petitioner along with six others persons came on two motorcycles and demanded electric switch and when the informant got suspicious, the accused persons entered inside the gate and started assaulting him and fired at him with intention to kill.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85136 of 2025(4) dt.30-03-2026 2/2 submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offences as alleged in the F.I.R. The petitioner has been made accused merely on the basis of CCTV footage and thereafter he confessed his guilt and the petitioner is rotting in judicial custody since 04.08.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and name of the petitioner transpired in the present case on the basis of CCTV footage and thereafter the petitioner was identified in the TIP which suggest that petitioner was involved in the present crime in question and apart from that petitioner carries one criminal antecedent other than the present one in which he is bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with A.C.J.M., V, Nawada pending in the Court of Hisua P.S. Case No. 436 of 2025.

7. Prayer is refused.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Suruchi/- U T