Praveen Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86487 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-266 Year-2025 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Praveen Kumar S/O Naresh Yadav @ Ram Naresh Yadav R/O VillageMarsaiti, Ward No. 07, P.O. and P.S.- Teghra, Distt.- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rananjay Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Kumar Binode Bariar, Adv.
Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-12-2025 Heard Mr. Rananjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 266 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 74, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and later on Section 103(1) of the B.N.S., 2023 was added.
3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the petitioner, along with others, including 10-15 unknown persons being armed with lathi, danda and iron rods, arrived and started abusing. It is further alleged that when Surendra Yadav and others came to rescue, all the accused persons badly assaulted
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86487 of 2025(2) dt.18-12-2025 2/3 them. In this case one Surendra Yadav has received injuries and died during the course of treatment.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the FIR, it is clear that the nature of the allegation is general and omnibus. There is no specific allegation against this petitioner of any overt act. He further submits that from perusal of the injury report, it is clear that the cause of death as opined by the doctor conducting the postmortem is that death was due to a chronic debilitating condition. Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 08.09.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86487 of 2025(2) dt.18-12-2025 3/3 of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 266 of 2025.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T