← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6178/2019bail granted

Rajesh Ram v. The State Of Bihar And ANR

2019-02-04Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6178 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1468 Year-2016 Thana- WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- West Champaran ====================================================== Rajesh Ram, S/o Pundeo Ram, Resident of Village- Balua Briti Tola, P.S.- Pahadpur, District- East Champaran at Present Village Lohiyar, Mathtali Tola, P.S- Harsidhi, Distt. East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Anita Devi @ Bidauti, W/o Rajesh Ram, D/o- Mukhdeo Ram, R/o VillageMachharganwa, P.S. Bairiya, District-West Champaran. ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 498(A) of the IPC and 4 of the D. P. Act.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The petitioner is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6178 of 2019(2) dt.04-02-2019 2/2 the husband of the victim. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with S.C. Case No. 1301/2017, arising out of Complaint Case No. 1468C of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T