Chandrika Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2134 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2020 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

Chandrika Yadav Son of Late Gokul Yadav, resident of Village-Dhorparan, P.S. Simultalla, District-Jamui.

2.

Dharmendra Kumar @ Dharmendra Yadav, son of Chandrika Yadav, resident of Village-Dhorparan, P.S. Simultalla, District-Jamui. 3.

Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Yadav, Son of Chandrika Yadav, resident of Village-Dhorparan, P.S. Simultalla, District-Jamui. 4.

Pinki Devi, Daughter of Chandrika Yadav, resident of Village-Dhorparan, P.S. Simultalla, District-Jamui.

5.

Sulena Devi @ Sunaina Devi, Daughter of Chandrika Yadav, resident of Village-Dhorparan, P.S. Simultalla, District-Jamui. 6.

Simmi Devi @ Shilpi Devi, Daughter of Chandrika Yadav, resident of Village-Dhorparan, P.S. Simultalla, District-Jamui. 7.

Nilam Devi, Daughter of Chandrika Yadav, resident of Village-Dhorparan, P.S. Simultalla, District-Jamui.

8.

Mina Devi, Wife of Chandrika Yadav, resident of Village-Dhorparan, P.S. Simultalla, District-Jamui.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Lakshmi Devi, Wife of Mahendra Yadav, resident of Village-Dhorparan, P.S. Simultalla, District-Jamui.

... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 20-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 10.03.2021 passed by learned A.C.J.M. - 2nd, Jamui in connection with Case No. 72-C of 2020 whereby learned Magistrate has taken cognizance under Sections 323,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2134 of 2024(2) dt.20-01-2025 2/2 379, 427, 504 and 354 of Indian Penal Code.

3. After short argument, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to to raise all such points before the learned trial court itself after framing of charge.

4. Permission is granted.

5. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) Rajeev/- U T