Brajesh Kumar @ Brajesh Kumar Kumar @ Budhiram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89230 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-163 Year-2024 Thana- BUXAR MUFFSIL District- Buxar ====================================================== Brajesh Kumar @ Brajesh Kumar Kumar @ Budhiram Yadav Son of Sriman Narayan Singh Resident of village-Karhansi, P.S.- Buxar, Distt.- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Buxar (M) P.S. Case No.163 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable u/s 304B and 34 of the IPC.

3.

As per the prosecution case, petitioner is said to have killed the daughter of the informant on the pretext of nonfulfillment of demand for dowry. 4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to enmity. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Petitioner is the husband of the deceased and there is no specific overt act against him. There is no evidence

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89230 of 2024(3) dt.13-02-2025 2/2 to support the allegation levelled against the petitioner. It is further submitted that charge has already been framed against the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been rotting in judicial custody since 04.06.2024. 5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as considering the nature of offence, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.

7.

This application is, accordingly, dismissed.

8.

However, petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after examination of the informant.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T