Raushan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2887 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2023 Thana- HARPUR District- Munger ====================================================== Raushan Yadav son of Pataku Yadav, resident of Village-Nav Toliya, P.S.- Tarapur, District-Munger.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Manohar Prasad Singh, Advocate For the State :

Md. Fahimuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-03-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 385, 387, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case in brief is that on 19.06.2023 at about 2 o'clock, while the informant was measuring the land, in the meantime, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, came there and abused, assaulted and demanded ransom of Rs. 5,00,000/- from the informant. It is further alleged that this petitioner opened fire from a country made pistol but fortunately no one sustained injuries.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that though there is allegation of firing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2887 of 2024(3) dt.07-03-2024 2/2 against this petitioner, but no one has sustained any injuries. It is next submitted that due to previous dispute between the informant and co-accused Mithun Sah, this false and concocted case has been lodged with ulterior motive.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail and submitted that there is specific accusation of firing against this petitioner and petitioner has also got seven criminal antecedents.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, specific accusation of firing against this petitioner and criminal antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T