Kavindra Singh @ Kamendra Singh @ Chapdadhi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.126 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-312 Year-2020 Thana- SARAN COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSaran ====================================================== 1.
KAVINDRA SINGH @ KAMENDRA SINGH @ CHAPDADHI SON OF KAMESHWAR SINGH R/O VILLAGE- MATHIHAN, P.S.- DARIYAPUR, DIST.- CHAPRA AT SARAN 2.
AMRENDRA SINGH SON OF RAJENDRA SINGH R/O VILLAGEMATHIHAN, P.S.- DARIYAPUR, DIST.- CHAPRA AT SARAN 3.
CHUNNU SINGH @ CHUNU SINGH SON OF DINESH SINGH R/O VILLAGE- MATHIHAN, P.S.- DARIYAPUR, DIST.- CHAPRA AT SARAN ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.
REENA DEVI WIFE OF ARUN KUMAR KHALIKA NAT R/O VILLAGE- DIGHWARA, P.S.- DIGHWARA, DIST.- SARAN ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellants :
Mr. Jay Ram Prasad, Advocate For the State :
N o n e ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the appellants.
2. Even after repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the State to assist the Court.
3. This appeal has been filed for setting aside order dated 12.10.2023 passed by the learned Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST (POA) Act, Chapra at Saran in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341 and 354 of the
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.126 of 2024(3) dt.10-11-2025 2/3 Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(r) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, whereby the prayer for anticipatory bail of these appellants has been rejected.
4. From bare perusal of the impugned order it is apparent that cognizance has already been taken by the learned trial court under Sections 341 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(r) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to these appellants is not maintainable as per law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Bachu Das Vs. State of Bihar and others, reported in (2014) 3 Supreme Court Cases 471.
6. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and pronouncement of law rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bachu Das (supra), appellants' prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail is rejected and this appeal stands dismissed.
7. Let a copy of this order be faxed to the learned
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.126 of 2024(3) dt.10-11-2025 3/3 Advocate General forthwith for necessary action in this regard. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T