Hari Mohan Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86198 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-306 Year-2025 Thana- DIGHWARA District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Hari Mohan Singh S/O Late Sharwanand Singh Resident of VillageRamdaschak, P.O. and P.S.- Dighwara, District- Saran. 2.
Niraj Kumar @ Niraj Kr. Singh S/O Hari Mohan Singh Resident of VillageRamdaschak, P.O. and P.S.- Dighwara, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Manish Chandra Gandhi For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Renuka Ratnakar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-03-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109 read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S, 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 03.08.2025 at 10 A.M. while he was going to Patna when he was intercepted by accused persons including the petitioners and Hari Mohan Singh gave orders to kill, on which, Neeraj assaulted him with sword causing injury beneath his eye, thereafter Raushan assaulted by farsha causing injury on leg of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86198 of 2025(3) dt.19-03-2026 2/3 Nirmal, further Deepak and Uday assaulted Nirmal with lathi and danda, on account of which he became unconscious. It is also alleged that earlier the accused persons had assaulted his minor daughter Aditi prior to the present occurrence for which a Sanha was also given to the police.
4. Learned counsel submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that Hari Mohan Singh is own cousin brother of the informant and he has been implicated in the instant case along with his son on account of dispute relating to property. It is also submitted that from side of the petitioners, Dighwara P.S. Case No.304/2025 has been instituted as such the instant FIR is a counter blast. It is next submitted that even injury suffered by Ajay, Nirmal and Aditi have been opined to be simple in nature and petitioners are not criminals.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86198 of 2025(3) dt.19-03-2026 3/3 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dighwara P.S. Case No.306/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T