← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/218/2019allowed

Dharmendra Kumar Ray v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-05-06Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran,Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.218 of 2019 ====================================================== Dharmendra Kumar Ray, Son of Bhikar Ray, Resident of Village-Morsandi, P.S.-Motipur, Distt.-Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Registration, Excise & Prohibition Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The District Magistrate-cum Collector, Sheohar 3.

The Superintendent of Police, Sheohar 4.

The Officer in-charge (S.H.O.) ,P.S. Shyampur,Bhataha ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Babu Rai, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Kumar Manish -SC5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN) Date : 06-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner prays for provisional release of the vehicle private goods carrier (P. VAN) bearing Registration No. BR06GB7825, Engine No. G600WIIIS568441614, Chassis No. MAT 491011F6G13175, which has been seized in connection with Shyampur Bhataha P.S. Case No. 76 of 2017 for the offences punishable under Sections 30 (a), 38 (i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that confiscation proceeding is yet to be initiated and the vehicle is lying

Patna High Court CWJC No.218 of 2019 dt.06-05-2019 2/3 under the open sky in the police station. The seizure list reflects the seizure of 41.67 liters of IMFL.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the nature of seizure made as well as the fact that the confiscation proceeding is yet to be initiated, we direct that the vehicle in question be released provisionally in favour of the petitioner on production of ownership and registration with respect to vehicle in question in his name before the designated Court below with one surety along with a Bank Guarantee or original title deed of immovable property situated within the district to the extent of the value of the vehicle as indicated in the insurance document. The petitioner while submitting the surety and the bank guarantee or the original title deed, as the case may be, shall also furnish the following affidavits / undertakings:

(i) That the vehicle in question has never been involved in any offence of similar nature in past and shall not indulge in similar offence in future.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in creating any third party right or interest in respect of the vehicle during the pendency of the confiscation proceeding, if any, and shall not alienate the vehicle during this period.

(iii) The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking to produce the vehicle before the confiscating authority as and when required. (iv) Prior to release of the vehicle, a Panchanama would be

Patna High Court CWJC No.218 of 2019 dt.06-05-2019 3/3 got prepared by the designated Court below, wherein the photograph of the vehicle shall be taken and will be certified by the petitioner and the same shall be kept on record so that in future, if so required, it may be used as a secondary evidence. The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking not to challenge the said Panchanama in course of trial.

The release shall be allowed within a period of 14 days from the date of production of ownership/registration papers supporting the claim of the petitioner together with one surety along with the bank guarantee to the extent of the value of the vehicle as indicated in the insurance amount and the undertakings as stated above. This release of the vehicle would, however, be subject to initiation and finalization of the confiscation proceeding. The title deed papers shall remain in safe custody of the designated Court below subject to final decision in the confiscation proceedings. With the observations/directions above, this writ petition is allowed.

(Jyoti Saran, J) ( Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amit/nasimulAFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 16.05.2019 Transmission Date N/A