← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./80713/2019rejected

Narendra Rai @ Nagendra Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2020-06-30Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Trivedi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80713 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2019 Thana- HAJIPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== NARENDRA RAI @ NAGENDRA RAI Son of Late Jamuna Rai Resident of Village- Purani Pool Road, Jauhari Bazar, P.S.- Hajipur- Town, DistrictVaishali at Hajipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dewendra Narayan Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 30-06-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant as well as learned APP through video conferencing.

In the background of persisting animosity resulting institution of a case at an earlier occasion for which, informant was being coerced to withdraw the case and having denial thereof, it has been alleged that on 23.02.2019 at about 6.30 AM, while informant came out from his house, accused, Nand Kishore Rai, Lalbabu Rai and Nagendra Rai encircled him, abused and with an intention to kill, Nand Kishore Rai sprinkled acid over his body while Lalbabu Rai and Nagendra Rai assaulted him with iron rod. Hearing cry, Nitesh Kumar, son of informant rushed, whereupon, Nagendra sprinkled acid over

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80713 of 2019(3) dt.30-06-2020 2/2 him also.

From the injury report, it is evident that Nitesh had sustained grievous injury caused by the acid having permanent disfigurement as well as left eye got damaged and informant, Krishna Nandan Prasad had also found similar kind of injury over his person. Apart from further statement of the informant, para-6, statement of injured substantiated the same. Apparel having been burnt due to sprinkling of acid was seized by the police in the hospital itself. Hence, petitioner is not at all found entitled for anticipatory bail, on account thereof, the same is, hereby, rejected.

(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J) perwez U T