Nazim Lal @ Md. Nazim Lal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81844 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2019 Thana- SINGHWARA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== NAZIM LAL @ MD. NAZIM LAL S/o Late Md. Hasim Resident of VillageBhapura, P.S.- Singhwara, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amarendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Ataur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-05-2020 This matter has been taken up through Video Conferencing.

Heard the parties.

The petitioner is languishing in custody for the offences punishable under Sections 147/149/ 341/ 323 /324 /307 /379/506 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner had allegedly caused injury at the head of the informant with a sword, which is corroborated by medical report.

Submission is that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. He is in custody since 23.10.2019. Investigation of the case is already complete. There is no allegation of repetition of blow.

Considering the fact that there is no chance of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81844 of 2019(3) dt.27-05-2020 2/2 conclusion of the trial in near future due to ongoing lock down and the fact that there is no material to substantiate that the petitioner is going to tamper with the evidence or hamper the trial, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with Singhwara P.S. Case No. 86 of 2019 with following conditions: (a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(c) The petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.

If the petitioner would not be able in furnishing sureties due to lock-down, he shall be provisionally released on his personal bond and the provisional bail shall be confirmed only after production of the bailors within fifteen days of restoration of normal function of the Court.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T