← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2332/2025dismissed

Avadhesh Yadav @ Awdhesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-13Mr. Justice Praveen Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2332 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-123 Year-2023 Thana- KHODAWANDPUR District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

Avadhesh Yadav @ Awdhesh Yadav Son of Horil Yadav village- Sahuri Baraipura, Ward no.10, Barajpura, P.S-. Khodawandpur (Chhaurahi O.P), Dist- Begusarai, Bihar 2.

Rudal Yadav son of Horil Yadav village- Sahuri Baraipura, Ward no.10, Barajpura, P.S-. Khodawandpur (Chhaurahi O.P), Dist- Begusarai, Bihar 3.

Vibha Devi Wife of Rudal Yadav village- Sahuri Baraipura, Ward no.10, Barajpura, P.S-. Khodawandpur (Chhaurahi O.P), Dist- Begusarai, Bihar 4.

Ramsumari Devi@ Ramsomari Devi wife of Avdhesh Yadav village- Sahuri Baraipura, Ward no.10, Barajpura, P.S-. Khodawandpur (Chhaurahi O.P), Dist- Begusarai, Bihar 5.

Lalita Devi wife of Horil Yadav village- Sahuri Baraipura, Ward no.10, Barajpura, P.S-. Khodawandpur (Chhaurahi O.P), Dist- Begusarai, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Shailo Devi wife of Dinesh Yadav village- Barajpura, P.S-. Khodawandpur (Chhaurahi O.P), Dist- Begusarai, Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to raise all the points available to him at the time of framing of charge.

3. Prayer is allowed.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2332 of 2025(2) dt.13-03-2026 2/2

4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.

5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of this case.

(Praveen Kumar, J) shivam/- U T