Patna High CourtCR. MISC./969/2024bail rejected

Ramkrishna Kumar @ Anurag @ Anurag Kumar @ Ramkrishan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-19Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.969 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2022 Thana- MADHWAPUR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ramkrishna Kumar @ Anurag @ Anurag Kumar @ Ramkrishan Kumar S/O Vijay Kumar Thakur R/o Vill-Pirokhar PS-Madhwapur Dist-Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Subhash Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 19-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Madhwapur P.S. Case No. 01 of 2022 registered on 04.01.2022 under Sections 341, 323, 447, 324, 354(A), 308, 379, 504, 506/34 of the I.P.C. pending before Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Benipatti, Madhubani

3. As per the prosecution case, F.I.R. has been lodged against four named accused persons including the petitioner against whom there is an allegation that they have surrounded the informant when he was returning to his house and it has been alleged that Anurag and Abhiram Thakur both attacked on the informant's side due to which they injured.

4. Counsel further submits that petitioner is innocent

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.969 of 2024(3) dt.19-04-2024 2/2 and has committed no offence. He further submits that petitioner having no criminal case pending against him. He further submits that petitioner is not criminal rather dispute has arisen by virtue of theft of cow dung in the village

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is allegation against the petitioner that he has assaulted the informant.

6. As such, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Sunnykr/- U