Pramila Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.80466 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. DistrictBhagalpur ====================================================== 1.

Pramila Devi, wife of Late Raju Sharma, 2.

Asbbo Sharma,son of late Raju Sharma 3.

Rekha Devi, D/o. Late Raju Sharma, All are resident of village Singhkund, P.S. Kharik, Dist.Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjan Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 17-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 498(A), 494, 323, 313, 341, 504,506/34 IPC registered in connection with Bhagalpur Mahila P.S. Case No. 04 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated merely because they happen to be variously related to the husband of the informant. The husband of the informant has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. 72146 of 2018.m The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances, in the event of the petitioners' arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.80466 of 2018(2) dt.17-01-2019 2/2 learned S.D.J.M.,Bhagalpur, in connection with Bhagalpur Mahila P.S. Case No. 04 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners.

(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) The petitioner nos. 1 and 3 shall be well represented and petitioner no. 2 shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T