← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./79621/2019bail granted

Aryan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2020-09-07Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79621 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Nalanda ====================================================== ARYAN KUMAR Son of Sri Rabindra Singh @ Shadujee Resident of Village - Patel Nagar Sonaru, P.S.- Fatuha, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kartik Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umeshanand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-09-2020 Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of Virtual Court proceeding.

The matter has been listed under the heading 'For Orders' under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 376, 323, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3 and 4 of D.P. Act.

The prosecution allegation, in short, is that the accused person established physical relation with the informant on the assurance of the marriage and later denied. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79621 of 2019(5) dt.07-09-2020 2/2 present case. The petitioner is alleged to have established physical relationship on the assurance of marriage. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at best, it is a case of consensual sex. He has placed reliance of a case of the Hon'ble Supreme Court since reported in 2019 SCC Online SC-3100 (Dr. Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar versus The State of Maharastra & Ors).

On behalf of the State and the informant, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 100 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T