Bablu Kumar @ Babblu Kumar @ Babali @ Ranjesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86316 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-341 Year-2025 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Bablu Kumar @ Babblu Kumar @ Babali @ Ranjesh Kumar S/O Lal Babu Singh R/O Village- Gumati, P.S- Raja Pakar, Distt.- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-12-2025 Heard Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Narsingh Tanti, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Raja Pakar (Baranti) P.S. Case No. 341 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(B) and 29 of the NDPS Act.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that altogether 5.6 grams of Kota (heroin) were recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. It has also been submitted that the police have not complied with Section

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86316 of 2025(2) dt.17-12-2025 2/2 105 of the BNSS and have also not complied with Section 50 of the NDPS as well. He further submits that the quantum of contraband that has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner is just above the small quantity and much less than the commercial quantity. Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 02.10.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Raja Pakar (Baranti) P.S. Case No. 341 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T