Randhir Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87982 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1588 Year-2024 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Randhir Kumar Son of Lalbabu Sahni Resident of village- Mahmadpur Khaje, PS- Karja, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 88234 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1588 Year-2024 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Mukesh Rai Son of Ramuchit Rai Resident of Village -Kishunpur Mohani Tole, PS -Kudhani, District - Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 87982 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Anish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Asha Kumari (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 88234 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Anish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Asha Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 1588 of 2024 dated 23.11.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87982 of 2024(2) dt.18-01-2025 2/2
3. As per the prosecution case, total 1173 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from the truck and Pickup van.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioners are neither the driver nor the owner of the said vehicle. The petitioners have no concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioners have clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 24.11.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners abovenamed, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Muzaffapur in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 1588 of 2024.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T