Ajay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85398 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2019 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Saharsa ====================================================== Ajay Kumar, Male, aged about 22 years, Son of Mangal Marandi, Resident of Village - Kumhraghat, P.S.- Bihra, District- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Amarnath Jha, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Manoj Kumar (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
Allegation is recovery of 15 liters of country made liquor from the possession of petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing was recovered from his conscious possession. He has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 10.11.2019.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85398 of 2019(2) dt.07-01-2020 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IIcum-Special Judge Excise Act, Saharsa, in connection with Special (Excise) Case No. 546 of 2019 arising out of Excise Department Case No. 156 of 2019, subject to conditions:
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bonds. (S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T