← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3325/2025bail rejected

Md. Pappu @ Md. Pappu Alam @ Mohammad Jakir v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-12Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3325 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2024 Thana- RAUTARA District- Katihar ====================================================== Md. Pappu @ Md. Pappu Alam @ Mohammad Jakir Son of Sheikh Jauhari @ Sheikh Jahur, Resident of Village- Sheikh Tola, Rautara, PS- Rautara, Distt.- Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Mandal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 12-02-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The accused/petitioner is named in F.I.R. and apprehending his arrest in connection with Rautara P.S. Case No. 54 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323,324, 307, 325, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.The allegation against the petitioner is to assault informant and others with spade alongwith other co-accused persons, causing head and bodily injury, where the occurrence alleged to be arising out of land dispute.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3325 of 2025(2) dt.12-02-2025 2/3

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the allegation qua physical assault is appearing very much general and omnibus against this petitioner. It is submitted that the allegation of physical assault is also available against co-accused Mahboob Alam. Explaining the occurrence, it is submitted that same took place in the background of land dispute. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that petitioner found involved in two more criminal cases, where he is on bail.

5. Learned APP while opposing the prayer of bail submitted that the petitioner alleged to assault specifically on the head of father of the informant, causing incised wound by using sharp edged cut weapon and upon medical examination, same was found grievous in nature, suggesting prima facie that he was under intention to cause death of the father of the informant, who is injured in present case.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and by taking note of fact as petitioner alleged to cause grievous injury on the vital part of the body of the injured, where nature of injury appears prima facie

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3325 of 2025(2) dt.12-02-2025 3/3 corroborating to that of nature of weapon alleged to be used during the occurrence by petitioner, accordingly, the prayer of anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected herewith. (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) veena/- U T