Ram Prasad Thakur v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri R. K. Mahajan, The Commissioner Cum Secretary, Department Of Human R

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 2860 of 2018 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 243 of 2008 ====================================================== Ram Prasad Thakur Son of Late Ramdeo Thakur, Resident of Village- Mile, P.O.- Bhairopur Deorhi Police Station- Bidupur, District- Vaishali (Hajipur), At present Assistant Teacher, Primary School Rajashan Bidupur, Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Sri R. K. Mahajan, the Commissioner-cumSecretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Bihar, Patna. 2.

Sri M. Ramchandru Du, the Director, Primary Education Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Education Establishment Committee through its Chairmancum- District Magistrate, Vaishali namely Sri Rajeev Raushan. 4.

The District Superintendent of Education, District- Vaishali Post abolished and Power vested in the District Programme Officer, Vaishali, Hajipur namely Mr. Dinesh Chaudhary.

5.

Sri Santosh Kumar, Treasury Officer, Vaishali, Hajipur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary and Mr. Braj Bhushan Mishra, Advocate For the State :

Mr. P. M. Sharan, AC to AAG 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 26-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC to AAG 15 for the State.

2. The petitioner has moved the Court alleging violation and disobedience of the order dated 24.08.2010 passed in CWJC No. 243 of 2008.

Patna High Court MJC No.2860 of 2018 dt.26-08-2019 2/2

3. The said order required the authorities to consider the case of the petitioner in terms of the Full Bench decision of this Court dated 21.04.2009 passed in LPA No. 985 of 1996.

4. In the show cause filed on behalf of opposite party no. 5 on 17.08.2019, copy of office order dated 30.05.2019 passed by the District Programme Officer, Establishment, Vaishali had been brought on record by which the claim of the petitioner was rejected. Today, supplementary show cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite party no. 4 enclosing copy of office order dated 20.08.2019, by way of a corrigendum in which it has been stated that the order dated 30.05.2019 has been passed in light of the decision of the Full Bench in LPA No. 985 of 1996.

5. In view thereof, the Court finds that the order dated 24.08.2010 passed in CWJC No. 243 of 2008, stands complied with.

6. Accordingly, the application stands disposed off. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U T