Raju Kumar @ Raju Kushwaha @ Raju Singh @ Raju Singh Kushwaha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86493 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-209 Year-2025 Thana- SITAMARHI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Raju Kumar @ Raju Kushwaha @ Raju Singh @ Raju Singh Kushwaha S/O Late Suresh Kushwaha @ Suresh Singh @ Surendra Singh R/O VillageRamnagra, P.S- Riga, Distt.- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Krishna Prabhat, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 209 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that three persons who have masked their faces have snatched a bag containing Rs. 53,700, a tab, a biometric charger, and a purse. The bag also contains Driving license, ATM cards.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants. During the course of investigation, the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86493 of 2025(2) dt.18-12-2025 2/2 petitioner was remanded in this case from Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 256 of 2025, and he has given his confessional statement. No recovery has been made from the possession of this petitioner. It has also been submitted that after this case, he has been remanded in all the cases of similar nature. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 30.03.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of sixteen cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the condition that one of the bailor should be close relative and that the petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and will be present in the learned trial court on each and every date till the trial is concluded. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sitamarhi in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 209 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T