Mahesh Kumar Agrawal v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18388 of 2018 ====================================================== Mahesh Kumar Agrawal S/o Late Ram Krishna Agrawal resident of Bank Road, Raxaul-845305 Distirct-East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forest, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

2.

The Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forest, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

3.

The Secretary, Ministry of Health, Govt. of India, New Delhi. 4.

The Secretary, Ministry of Railways, Govt. of India, New Delhi. 5.

The General Manager, East Central Railways, Hajipur, Vaishali. 6.

The Divisional Railway Manager, Samastipur Division, East Central Railways.

7.

The Central Pollution Control Board through its Chairman, New Delhi. 8.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 9.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Environment and Forest, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

10.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 11.

The Bihar State Pollution Control Board through its Chairman, Patna. 12.

The National Human Rights Commission, New Delhi. 13.

The District Magistrate, Raxaul.

14.

The Superintendent of Police, Raxaul.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gautam Kumar Kejriwal, Adv.

For the Respondent-State :

Mr. Tej Pratap Singh, AC to AAG-13.

For the Respondents no 4 to 6: Mr. D. K. Sinha, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anil Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent no. 11 : Ms. Binita Singh, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN) 28-06-2019 Learned counsel for the parties are present.

The matter is listed at the instance of learned counsel

Patna High Court CWJC No.18388 of 2018(2) dt.28-06-2019 2/2 for the petitioner Mr. Gautam Kumar Kejriwal, who while praying for withdrawal of the writ petition submits that the petitioner would take recourse to such remedy as may be available to him in law.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (Jyoti Saran, J) ( Partha Sarthy, J) Anjula/Surendra U