Tuddu Ram @ Tudu Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87276 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2025 Thana- KACCHWA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Tuddu Ram @ Tudu Ram, Son of Dipati Ram, Resident of Village - Bheriya, P.S. - Kachhawa, District - Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Varun Krishna Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Kachhawa P.S. Case No. 93 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 80 of B.N.S.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that Leelavati Kumari (deceased) was married to this petitioner in year 2021. It is further alleged that petitioner subjected the deceased to cruelty on account of non-fulfillment of dowry demand of golden chain. The petitioner is also a drunkard and used to assault the deceased. It is alleged that a call was received regarding death of the deceased. When the informant reached the matrimonial house of the deceased, he found that his daughter was lying dead.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87276 of 2025(3) dt.03-02-2026 2/2 offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Actually, the deceased has committed suicide and from perusal of the postmortem report it will transpire that the doctor conducting autopsy of the deceased has found only one antemortem injury i.e. ligature mark and the cause of death is asphyxia due to hanging. It has also been submitted that save and except the ligature mark, no injury was found on the person of the deceased which goes to show that the petitioner has not assaulted her. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 23.04.2025.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Kachhawa P.S. Case No. 93 of 2025.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T