← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85342/2025bail granted

Pavitra Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-18Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85342 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2024 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE - BENIPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

Pavitra Sahu Son of Late Jamun Sahu Resident of Ward No.05, Village -Dholi PO- Vasauna PS -Vangaon Dist- Saharasa 2.

Urmila Devi Wife of Pavitra Sahu Resident of Ward No.05, Village -Dholi PO- Vasauna PS -Vangaon Dist- Saharasa 3.

Ratan Sahu Son of Pavitra Sahu Resident of Ward No.05, Village -Dholi POVasauna PS -Vangaon Dist- Saharasa 4.

Nandan Sahu son of Pavitra Sahu Resident of Ward No.05, Village -Dholi PO- Vasauna PS -Vangaon Dist- Saharasa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Kanchan Kumari Daughter of Vaidhnath Sah Resident of Village - Mahinaam, PS- Bahers, Dist- Saharsa ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anand Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 191 of 2024 for the offences under Sections 115, 156, 303 and 84 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners are accused of assaulting and torturing the victim for demand of dowry.

4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85342 of 2025(5) dt.18-06-2026 2/3 petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in this case.

5. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the application of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submission of the parties and in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273, this application of grant of anticipatory bail is allowed.

7. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Benipur/concerned Court below in connection with Complaint Case No. 191 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS.

8. As a condition of this order, the petitioner side is directed to pay a maintenance amount of Rs. 8,000/- from the month of June 2026 to the complainant/informant. The maintenance for the month of June 2026 shall be paid to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85342 of 2025(5) dt.18-06-2026 3/3 complainant/informant within ten days from today, and thereafter, the maintenance amount shall be paid to the complainant/informant every month before the 10th day of each month.

9. It is made clear that the order of maintenance passed by this Court shall be subject to the outcome of the maintenance case in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court concerned, if any.

10. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Darbhanga/ concerned Court below through FAX for its compliance forthwith. (Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T