Manjeet Yadav @ Manjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.285 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-224 Year-2019 Thana- ARA MUFFSIL District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Manjeet Yadav @ Manjeet Kumar S/O LALBABU RAY @ LALAK YADAV VILLAGE- MAHKAMPUR BARA, PS. ARA MUFFASIL, DIST. BHOJPUR.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anish Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-02-2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of three weeks from today.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

3. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ara Muffasil P.S. Case No. 224 of 2019, dated 12.08.2019, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307/34, 341, 323, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused Ranjeet Yadav alleged to have assaulted the informant brother with rod and lathi due to which he sustained injury on his head, back and other part of the body.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.285 of 2024(2) dt.12-02-2024 2/2 petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in Para 3 of the bail petition in which he is on bail. He further submits that the letter issued by Officer Incharge, Superintendent of Sadar Hospital, Bhojpur, no X-ray or CT was not done. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to land dispute. There is a delay in lodging the F.I.R.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Ara Muffasil P.S. Case No. 224 of 2019, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

8. This application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Ranjeet/- U T