← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/615/2024disposed

Barhamdew Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-21Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.615 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.

Barhamdew Ram Son of Late Balkeshwar Ram Resident of Village-Rampur, P.S. Jamhore, District-Aurangabad.

2.

Rita Kumari D/o Shyam Lal Ram Resident of Vilage-Rampur, P.S. Jamhore, District-Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, District-Aurangabad. 3.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Aurangabad, District-Aurangabad. 4.

The Circle Officer, Sadar, District-Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Janardan Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr.Sunil Kumar Dubey, Advocate Mr. Uday Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Government Pleader- 20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 21-10-2024 Though the present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 07.08.2023 passed by the Circle Officer, Aurangabad in connection with Encroachment Case No. 14 of 2018-19, as also the order dated 10.10.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Aurangabad in Encroachment Appeal Case No. 90 of 2023, however, it is pointed out by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State, by referring to the counter affidavit filed in the present case, that the encroachment in question has already stood removed, hence in case the petitioners are so aggrieved, they may approach the District

Patna High Court CWJC No.615 of 2024(3) dt.21-10-2024 2/2 Magistrate, Aurangabad for settlement of land/issuance of appropriate parcha in their favour on account of them belonging to the Mahadalit and extremely backward class category and being landless.

2.

In view of the aforesaid, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioners to approach the District Magistrate, Aurangabad for redressal of their subsisting grievances, if any. Liberty, so sought, is granted. 3.

The writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U