← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/22242/2018withdrawn

Prabhu Narayan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-04Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22242 of 2018 ====================================================== Prabhu Narayan Singh S/o Late Mushafir Singh, Shivaji Path, MohallaYarpur Rajputana, P.S.- Gardanibag, District and Town- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reform Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reform Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

District Magistrate, Patna.

4.

District Land acquisition Officer, Patna.

5.

Municipal Town Commissioner, Patna Municipal corporation, Patna. 6.

Executive Officer, Nutan Rajdhani Circle, Patna, Municipal corporation, Patna.

7.

Executive Engineer, Nutan Rajdhani Division (South), Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs. Shruti Sinha, Adv.

Mr. Arbind Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad, G.P.-14 For the PMS :

Mr. Sanjay Prakash Verma, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 04-11-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s):

for issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction, commanding Respondents authorities to stop any work of construction as per advertisement made under item no. 37 of Tender no. (E- Tender)- 09/ E/ NCD (S) / 2018-19 of the office of Respondent no. 7 published in Hindi Daily

Patna High Court CWJC No.22242 of 2018(2) dt.04-11-2025 2/2 News Paper, namely Prabhat Khabar, dated 08/09/2018 till payment of compensation amount to petitioner being Raiyati Land holder, by making an Award under a proper and legal Land Acquisition proceeding in the eye of law and for grant of any other suitable relief/reliefs for which petitioner is found entitled in the eye of law.

3. Mrs. Shruti Sinha on the instruction of Mr. Arbind Kumar Singh in the presence of learned State Counsel prays for withdrawal of the petition.

4. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as withdrawn. (Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U