Upendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85513 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-126 Year-2025 Thana- Kaler District- Arwal ====================================================== Upendra Singh S/O Late Sripati Yadav Resident Of Village- Belaon, P.SKaler, Distt.- Arwal. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-01-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126, 115(2), 352, 110, 117(2), 351(3), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that petitioner along with his wife Pramila Devi entered his house at 7.30 AM on 12.09.2025 and started assaulting his grandmother on issue of Adhar card and when his mother intervened, petitioner assaulted her by rod causing injury on head, while Pramila also assaulted his mother.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that petitioner and the informant are agnates and on account of dispute relating to property, an

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85513 of 2025(2) dt.13-01-2026 2/2 altercation had taken place in which both side assaulted each other. It is also submitted that in order to give seriousness to the case, it is alleged that it was petitioner who assaulted grandmother and mother of the informant. It is next submitted that women folk of both the side assaulted each other and injury has been suffered by both the side and the injury suffered by the side of the informant has been opined to be simple in nature. It is also submitted that petitioner is not a criminal.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kaler P.S. Case No.126/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) B.N.S.S. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T