Bijay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80202 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-374 Year-2018 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani ====================================================== BIJAY YADAV Son of Ishwar Yadav Resident of Village - Champa, P.S.- Arer, District - Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Shailo Devi Wife of Bijay Yadav Resident of Village - Champa, P.S.- Arer, District - Madhubani. At present D/o. Ramlal Yadav, Resident of Village - Kakraul, P.S.- Rahika, District - Madhubani.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 28-10-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case no. 374 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Sections 498A, 323, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with his family members has tortured in various ways due to nonfulfillment of dowry demand and finally they ousted her from matrimonial home after snatching her belongings. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80202 of 2019(6) dt.28-10-2021 2/2 has submitted that petitioner is husband of the informant and has been falsely implicated in this case. He has never demanded any thing from the informant. It is further contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to keep his wife with full honour and dignity.

Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer of bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the submission made on behalf of the petitioner that he is ready to keep his wife, this Court is inclined to enlarge him on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Complaint Case no. 374 of 2018 he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Munsif-cumJudicial Magistrate, Benipatti, Madhubani subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U