← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./87117/2019disposed

Ragho Mandal @ Radhe Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-23Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87117 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-550 Year-2019 Thana- BANKA District- Banka ====================================================== 1.

RAGHO MANDAL @ RADHE MANDAL Son of Late Birju Mandal Resident of Village - Bijay Nagar, P.S.- and Distt.- Banka. 2.

Munna Mandal Son of Ragho Mandal @ Radhe Mandal Resident of Village - Bijay Nagar, P.S.- and Distt.- Banka.

3.

Chhotu Mandal @ Chattu Mandal @ Chhotu Kumar Son of Ragho Mandal @ Radhe Mandal Resident of Village - Bijay Nagar, P.S.- and Distt.- Banka. 4.

Sumit Mandal @ Amit Kumar Mandal Son of Ragho Mandal @ Radhe Mandal Resident of Village - Bijay Nagar, P.S.- and Distt.- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shree Niwas Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-01-2020 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Banka P. S. Case No. 550 of 2019 disclosing offences under Sections 147, 149, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379, 504 of IPC.

As per prosecution case, there is allegation of demand and extortion and for that, assaulted the informant. Specific allegation is against petitioner no.1 of assault to Kishore Mandal by rod and against petitioner no.2 of assault to the informant by rod and petitioner no.3 of assault by rod to Manish, causing injuries.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87117 of 2019(2) dt.23-01-2020 2/2 Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that they are Pattidars. There was a land dispute between the parties. The injuries are simple in nature, except one injury caused to one Chandan Kumar Mandal which is attributed to the petitioner no.2 and the opinion about the same is kept reserved. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the above submissions, so far petitioner no.2 is concerned, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to him. He has to surrender and pray for regular bail.

So far other petitioners are concerned, let they in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Banka, in connection with Banka P. S. Case No. 550 of 2019. With the aforesaid, this application is disposed of. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T