Pawan Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1044 of 2024 ====================================================== Pawan Kumari W/o Sintu Singh, R/o Village- Gandhi Nagar, P.O- Bale, P.S.- Parwalpur Bele, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director (Primary Education), Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Education Officer, Nalanda.

4.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Nalanda. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ambrish Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Standing Counsel (6) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 05-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's case is squarely covered by the judgment passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No.22186 of 2019 and analogous cases. 3.

Considering the aforesaid facts, since the case of the petitioner stands on similar footing to that of the petitioners of C.W.J.C. No.22186 of 2019, there is no requirement to keep pending the present writ application.

5.

Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to file a detailed representation along with a copy of the order passed in the C.W.J.C. No.22186 of 2019, before the respondent no.4 within a

Patna High Court CWJC No.1044 of 2024(2) dt.05-04-2024 2/2 period of two weeks and the respondent no.4 is well advised to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, after affording him opportunity of personal hearing or his counsel and pass a reasoned and speaking order in light of C.W.J.C. No.22186 of 2019, within a period of eight weeks from the date of filing of such representation by the petitioner.

7.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the claim of the petitioner and it is also made clear that if the order is not complied with, the respondent no.4 shall be held liable for non-compliance of the order of this Court.

8.

With the aforesaid directions, this writ application is hereby disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U